Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 5750
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 5750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is positioned at rank 403 and the Radeon HD 5750 is on rank 143, so the Radeon HD 5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 5750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 5750 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Generation 7.5 (2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 5750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 5750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $40), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 59.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+59.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 5750
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Radeon HD 5750
The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the Radeon HD 5750 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the Radeon HD 5750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 22 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 720 (Radeon HD 5750). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 1,169 |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 720+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 1.008 TFLOPS+31% |
| ROPs | 4 | 16+300% |
| TMUs | 40+11% | 36 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5750 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 5750 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 5750's 86W — a 96.6% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5750). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-65% | 86W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+188% | 13.6 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon HD 5750 launched at $130 and now averages $25. The Radeon HD 5750 costs 37.5% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.3 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 46.8 (Radeon HD 5750) — the Radeon HD 5750 offers 59.7% better value. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $130-13% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $25-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3 | 46.8+60% |
| Codename | Haswell GT3e | Juniper |
| Release | May 27 2013 | October 13 2009 |
| Ranking | #835 | #834 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 5750
