Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is positioned at rank #403 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Generation 7.5 (2013)) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 500 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 22 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 64 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 500 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 1,200+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 320+400% | 64 |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz+140% | 500 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)'s 7W — a 124.3% difference. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 1W (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 7W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 171.4+338% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.3 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) — the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | Haswell GT3e | Lakefield GT2 |
| Release | May 27 2013 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #835 | #893 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
