GeForce 830A vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

NVIDIA

GeForce 830A

2014Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013Core: 200 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 830A vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 830A vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 830A

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 50.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.7 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 830A is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 11.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 830A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (1,173 vs 1,172), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 830A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 830A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 50.1% (11.7 vs 7.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 830A vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 830A

The GeForce 830A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,173 points.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 830A scores 1,173 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 830A is built on Maxwell while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 28 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 830A) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 830A) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 830AIris Pro Graphics 5200
G3D Mark Score
1,173
1,172
Architecture
Maxwell
Generation 7.5
Process Node
28 nm
22 nm
Shading Units
256
320+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5888 TFLOPS
0.768 TFLOPS+30%
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1200 MHz+4%
ROPs
8+100%
4
TMUs
16
40+150%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 830A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 830AIris Pro Graphics 5200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 830A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 carries 0 MB. GeForce 830A gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 830A and System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.

FeatureGeForce 830AIris Pro Graphics 5200
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 830A draws 33W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 830A) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce 830AIris Pro Graphics 5200
TDP
33W
30W-9%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
Legacy
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
35.5
39.1+10%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 830A came in at $100, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce 830A was 33.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.7 (GeForce 830A) vs 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) — the GeForce 830A offers 50% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 830A (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce 830AIris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP
$100-33%
$150
Performance per Dollar
11.7+50%
7.8
Codename
GM108
Haswell GT3e
Release
July 22 2014
May 27 2013
Ranking
#832
#835

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.