
GeForce 830A

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GeForce 830A vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 830A vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce 830A vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 830A
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.7 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 830A is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 11.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 830A vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 830A
The GeForce 830A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,173 points.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 830A scores 1,173 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 830A is built on Maxwell while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 28 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 830A) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 830A) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 830A | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,173 | 1,172 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 7.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 320+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 0.768 TFLOPS+30% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1200 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 8+100% | 4 |
| TMUs | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 830A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 830A | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 830A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 carries 0 MB. GeForce 830A gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 830A and System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
| Feature | GeForce 830A | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 830A draws 33W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 830A) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce 830A | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 30W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 35.5 | 39.1+10% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 830A came in at $100, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce 830A was 33.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.7 (GeForce 830A) vs 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) — the GeForce 830A offers 50% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 830A (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 830A | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.7+50% | 7.8 |
| Codename | GM108 | Haswell GT3e |
| Release | July 22 2014 | May 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #832 | #835 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















