G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 830A vs GeForce GTX 295 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 830A vs GeForce GTX 295: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 830A

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $399 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 388.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.7 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 289W, a 256W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 295 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 295

2009

Why buy it

✅26.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
399% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 11.7 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌775.8% higher power demand at 289W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 295 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 26.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (1,198 vs 1,173), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 830A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 830A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $399 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 388.6% (11.7 vs 2.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 295 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 830A vs GeForce GTX 295 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 830A

The GeForce 830A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,173 points.

GeForce GTX 295

The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 830A scores 1,173 and the GeForce GTX 295 reaches 1,198 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 830A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 295 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 830A) vs 480 (GeForce GTX 295). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 830A) vs 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 295).

Feature	GeForce 830A	GeForce GTX 295
G3D Mark Score	1,173	1,198+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	256	480 ×2+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5888 TFLOPS	0.5962 TFLOPS ×2+1%
ROPs	8	28 ×2+250%
TMUs	16	80 ×2+400%
L2 Cache	1 MB+355%	0.22 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 830A	GeForce GTX 295
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 830A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 295 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 295 gives you 250% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 830A and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 295. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 830A) vs 0.22 MB (GeForce GTX 295) — the GeForce 830A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 830A	GeForce GTX 295
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1.75 GB+250%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+355%	0.22 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 830A) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 295). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 830A	GeForce GTX 295
DirectX	12 (11_0)+8%	11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce 830A) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 295). Decoder: VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 830A) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 295).

Feature	GeForce 830A	GeForce GTX 295
Encoder	NVENC 3.0	PureVideo HD VP2
Decoder	VP6	PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 830A draws 33W versus the GeForce GTX 295's 289W — a 159% difference. The GeForce 830A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 830A) vs 680W (GeForce GTX 295). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 95°C.

Feature	GeForce 830A	GeForce GTX 295
TDP	33W-89%	289W
Recommended PSU	350W-49%	680W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80-16%	95°C
Perf/Watt	35.5+766%	4.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 830A came in at $100, while the GeForce GTX 295 launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce 830A was 80% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.7 (GeForce 830A) vs 2.4 (GeForce GTX 295) — the GeForce 830A offers 387.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 830A (2014 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce 830A	GeForce GTX 295
MSRP	$100-80%	$499
Performance per Dollar	11.7+387%	2.4
Codename	GM108	GT200B
Release	July 22 2014	January 8 2009
Ranking	#832	#816

Search GeForce 830A on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 295 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.