
GeForce 830A vs GeForce GT 640

GeForce 830A
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 640
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 830A is positioned at rank 344 and the GeForce GT 640 is on rank 107, so the GeForce GT 640 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 830A
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 640
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 830A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 640 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 830A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 830A holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 67.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+67.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 830A and GeForce GT 640

GeForce 830A
The GeForce 830A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,173 points.

GeForce GT 640
The GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 830A scores 1,173 and the GeForce GT 640 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 830A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 640 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 830A) vs 384 (GeForce GT 640). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 830A) vs 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640).
| Feature | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,173 | 1,169 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 0.6927 TFLOPS+18% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 32+100% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+300% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 830A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 640 has 4 GB. The GeForce GT 640 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 830A) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 640) — the GeForce 830A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 830A) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 640). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce 830A) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 640). Decoder: VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 830A) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 640).
| Feature | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | VP6 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 830A draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 640's 65W — a 65.3% difference. The GeForce 830A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 830A) vs 300W (GeForce GT 640). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-49% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 0mm | 145mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 60°C-25% |
| Perf/Watt | 35.5+97% | 18.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 830A launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce GT 640 launched at $99 and now averages $50. The GeForce 830A costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.1 (GeForce 830A) vs 23.4 (GeForce GT 640) — the GeForce 830A offers 67.1% better value. The GeForce 830A is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 830A | GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $99-1% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-40% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.1+67% | 23.4 |
| Codename | GM108 | GK107 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | June 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #832 | #837 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












