FirePro M4170
GeForce 830A
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce 830A Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce 830A FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce 830A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M4170
2015Why buy it
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 11.7 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.
GeForce 830A
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 100.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.7 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce 830A Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro M4170
The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.
GeForce 830A
The GeForce 830A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,173 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4170 scores 1,168 and the GeForce 830A reaches 1,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4170 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 830A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4170) vs 256 (GeForce 830A). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 830A). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168 | 1,173 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+50% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS+17% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1150 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24+50% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 128 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 830A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M4170 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4170 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 830A carries 512 MB. FirePro M4170 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4170 and 128-bit on the GeForce 830A. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M4170) vs 1 MB (GeForce 830A) — the GeForce 830A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4170) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 830A). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4170) vs NVENC 3.0 (GeForce 830A). Decoder: UVD vs VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4170) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 830A).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD | VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4170 draws 150W versus the GeForce 830A's 33W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 830A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4170) vs 350W (GeForce 830A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 33W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 35.5+355% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M4170 came in at $200, while the GeForce 830A launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 830A was 50% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (FirePro M4170) vs 11.7 (GeForce 830A) — the GeForce 830A offers 101.7% better value. The newer card here is FirePro M4170 (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $100-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.8 | 11.7+102% |
| Codename | Opal | GM108 |
| Release | April 23 2015 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #838 | #832 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M4170 and GeForce 830A
