
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce 830A

FirePro M4170
Popular choices:

GeForce 830A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M4170 is positioned at rank 196 and the GeForce 830A is on rank 344, so the FirePro M4170 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M4170
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 830A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 830A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M4170 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 830A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 830A holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $80), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 167.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+167.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M4170 and GeForce 830A

FirePro M4170
The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

GeForce 830A
The GeForce 830A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,173 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4170 scores 1,168 and the GeForce 830A reaches 1,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4170 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 830A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4170) vs 256 (GeForce 830A). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 830A). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168 | 1,173 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+50% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS+17% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1150 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24+50% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 128 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4170 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 830A has 512 MB. The FirePro M4170 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M4170) vs 1 MB (GeForce 830A) — the GeForce 830A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4170) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 830A). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4170) vs NVENC 3.0 (GeForce 830A). Decoder: UVD vs VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4170) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 830A).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD | VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4170 draws 150W versus the GeForce 830A's 33W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 830A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4170) vs 350W (GeForce 830A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 33W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 35.5+355% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M4170 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GeForce 830A launched at $100 and now averages $30. The GeForce 830A costs 62.5% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.6 (FirePro M4170) vs 39.1 (GeForce 830A) — the GeForce 830A offers 167.8% better value. The FirePro M4170 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $100-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $30-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.6 | 39.1+168% |
| Codename | Opal | GM108 |
| Release | April 23 2015 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #838 | #832 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












