FirePro M4170 vs Radeon R9 M265X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4170 vs Radeon R9 M265X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M4170 vs Radeon R9 M265X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4170

2015

Why buy it

✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M265X

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro M4170 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (1,168 vs 1,167), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M4170 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro M4170 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $200 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.1% (5.8 vs 5.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro M4170 vs Radeon R9 M265X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4170

The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

Radeon R9 M265X

The Radeon R9 M265X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,167 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4170 scores 1,168 and the Radeon R9 M265X reaches 1,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4170 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M265X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4170) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M265X). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M265X). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 625 MHz.

Feature	FirePro M4170	Radeon R9 M265X
G3D Mark Score	1,168	1,167
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	0.8 TFLOPS+16%
Boost Clock	900 MHz+44%	625 MHz
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	96 KB	160 KB+67%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M4170	Radeon R9 M265X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4170 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M265X.

Feature	FirePro M4170	Radeon R9 M265X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4170 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M265X's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M265X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4170) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M265X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	FirePro M4170	Radeon R9 M265X
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	7.8	15.6+100%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M4170 came in at $200, while the Radeon R9 M265X launched at $200. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (FirePro M4170) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 M265X) — the Radeon R9 M265X offers 0% better value. The newer card here is FirePro M4170 (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	FirePro M4170	Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP	$200	$200
Performance per Dollar	5.8	5.8
Codename	Opal	Venus
Release	April 23 2015	March 21 2014
Ranking	#838	#839

Search FirePro M4170 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M265X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.