FirePro M4170 vs Radeon HD 5750

FirePro M4170

2015Core: 825 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5750

2009Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro M4170 vs Radeon HD 5750 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4170 vs Radeon HD 5750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4170

2015

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 53.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
  • 74.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 86W.

Radeon HD 5750

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $70 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 54% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Draws 86W instead of 150W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 5750 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (1,169 vs 1,168), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M4170 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2009. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 5750 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $70 cheaper on MSRP at $130 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 54% (9.0 vs 5.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 5750 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M4170 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M4170 vs Radeon HD 5750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M4170

The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 5750

The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4170 scores 1,168 and the Radeon HD 5750 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4170 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 5750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4170) vs 720 (Radeon HD 5750). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750).

FeatureFirePro M4170Radeon HD 5750
G3D Mark Score
1,168
1,169
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
720+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
1.008 TFLOPS+46%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
36+50%
L1 Cache
96 KB+33%
72 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M4170Radeon HD 5750
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4170 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5750 carries 1 GB. FirePro M4170 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4170 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5750.

FeatureFirePro M4170Radeon HD 5750
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+300%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4170) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5750).

FeatureFirePro M4170Radeon HD 5750
Encoder
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4170 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 5750's 86W — a 54.2% difference. The Radeon HD 5750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4170) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureFirePro M4170Radeon HD 5750
TDP
150W
86W-43%
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
7.8
13.6+74%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M4170 came in at $200, while the Radeon HD 5750 launched at $130. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5750 was 35% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (FirePro M4170) vs 9.0 (Radeon HD 5750) — the Radeon HD 5750 offers 55.2% better value. The newer card here is FirePro M4170 (2015 vs 2009).

FeatureFirePro M4170Radeon HD 5750
MSRP
$200
$130-35%
Performance per Dollar
5.8
9.0+55%
Codename
Opal
Juniper
Release
April 23 2015
October 13 2009
Ranking
#838
#834

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.