FirePro M4170 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

FirePro M4170

2015Core: 825 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013Core: 200 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro M4170 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4170 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4170

2015

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro M4170 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 33.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 33.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.8 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (1,172 vs 1,168), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M4170 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 33.8% (7.8 vs 5.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M4170 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M4170 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M4170

The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4170 scores 1,168 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4170 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 28 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4170) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

FeatureFirePro M4170Iris Pro Graphics 5200
G3D Mark Score
1,168
1,172
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Generation 7.5
Process Node
28 nm
22 nm
Shading Units
384+20%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
0.768 TFLOPS+11%
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1200 MHz+33%
ROPs
8+100%
4
TMUs
24
40+67%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M4170Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4170 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 carries 0 MB. FirePro M4170 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4170 and System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.

FeatureFirePro M4170Iris Pro Graphics 5200
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4170 draws 150W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4170) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureFirePro M4170Iris Pro Graphics 5200
TDP
150W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
7.8
39.1+401%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M4170 came in at $200, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 was 25% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (FirePro M4170) vs 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) — the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers 34.5% better value. The newer card here is FirePro M4170 (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro M4170Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP
$200
$150-25%
Performance per Dollar
5.8
7.8+34%
Codename
Opal
Haswell GT3e
Release
April 23 2015
May 27 2013
Ranking
#838
#835

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.