
FirePro M4170

GeForce GT 650M
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce GT 650M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce GT 650M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce GT 650M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M4170
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
GeForce GT 650M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce GT 650M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4170
The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

GeForce GT 650M
The GeForce GT 650M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,187 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4170 scores 1,168 and the GeForce GT 650M reaches 1,187 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4170 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 650M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4170) vs 384 (GeForce GT 650M). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 650M). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 950 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168 | 1,187+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 0.7296 TFLOPS+6% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 950 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+200% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 650M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M4170 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4170 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 650M carries 2 GB. FirePro M4170 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4170 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 650M.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4170) vs 12 (FL11_0) (GeForce GT 650M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (FL11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4170) vs NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 650M). Decoder: UVD vs VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4170) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,MPEG-1/2 (GeForce GT 650M).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC (Kepler) |
| Decoder | UVD | VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,MPEG-1/2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4170 draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 650M's 45W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GT 650M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4170) vs 350W (GeForce GT 650M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 45W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 26.4+238% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is FirePro M4170 (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | — |
| Codename | Opal | GK107 |
| Release | April 23 2015 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #838 | #828 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















