
FirePro M4170

FireStream 9250
FirePro M4170 vs FireStream 9250 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M4170 vs FireStream 9250 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M4170 vs FireStream 9250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M4170
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $799 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 400.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
FireStream 9250
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌399.5% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M4170 vs FireStream 9250 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4170
The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

FireStream 9250
The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4170 scores 1,168 and the FireStream 9250 reaches 1,165 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4170 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FireStream 9250 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4170) vs 800 (FireStream 9250). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170) vs 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168 | 1,165 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 1 TFLOPS+45% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 160 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4170 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the FireStream 9250 carries 1 GB. FirePro M4170 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4170 and 64-bit on the FireStream 9250.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4170) vs 10.1 (FireStream 9250). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+19% | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4170) vs None (FireStream 9250). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4170) vs H.264,VC-1 (FireStream 9250).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4170 draws 150W versus the FireStream 9250's 150W — a 0% difference. The FireStream 9250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4170) vs 350W (FireStream 9250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 234mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs Unknown.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 234mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | Unknown-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 7.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M4170 came in at $200, while the FireStream 9250 launched at $999. On MSRP, FirePro M4170 was 80% cheaper ($799 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (FirePro M4170) vs 1.2 (FireStream 9250) — the FirePro M4170 offers 383.3% better value. The newer card here is FirePro M4170 (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-80% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.8+383% | 1.2 |
| Codename | Opal | RV770 |
| Release | April 23 2015 | June 16 2008 |
| Ranking | #838 | #840 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















