GeForce RTX 3070 vs FireStream 9250
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
FireStream 9250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9250
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FireStream 9250 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1803.2% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (8 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FireStream 9250.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1803.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1803.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 366.3% better value per dollar than the FireStream 9250.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+366.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and FireStream 9250
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
FireStream 9250
The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the FireStream 9250's 1,165 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 1803.2%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the FireStream 9250 uses TeraScale, both on 8 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 800 (FireStream 9250). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+1803% | 1,165 |
| Architecture | Ampere | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+636% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+1931% | 1 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+360% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+3525% | 0.16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FireStream 9250 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the FireStream 9250 has 1 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.25 MB (FireStream 9250) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+700% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 10.1 (FireStream 9250). Vulkan: 1.4 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+19% | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs None (FireStream 9250). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,VC-1 (FireStream 9250).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the FireStream 9250's 150W — a 37.8% difference. The FireStream 9250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (FireStream 9250). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 234mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs Unknown.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 150W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 234mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | Unknown-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+1192% | 7.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the FireStream 9250 launched at $999 and now averages $49. The FireStream 9250 costs 75.5% less ($151 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 23.8 (FireStream 9250) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 366% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | FireStream 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-50% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $49-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+366% | 23.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | RV770 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | June 16 2008 |
| Ranking | #63 | #840 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and FireStream 9250
