
GeForce RTX 3070

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅35.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (184 vs 136).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 165W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 220W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 184), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 and the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB reaches 22,713 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) with 184 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 22,713+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+35% | 4352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+9% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2535 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 184+35% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+35% | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+35% | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 184+35% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 3070 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB carries 16 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — a 55.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+56% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 165W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 242mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2.2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 165W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 242mm | 240mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-9% | 2.2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 137.7+37% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB launched at $499. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 2.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4 | 45.5+2% |
| Codename | GA104 | AD106 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #56 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














