GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3070.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $379 for the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB, it costs 47% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 85.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+85.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($379) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2407 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,599 points. Launch price was $379.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 and the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB reaches 22,599 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 4,608 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 23.7 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2572 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 36 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) with 184 Tensor cores vs 144.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 22,599+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+28% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 23.7 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2572 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 184+28% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+29% | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+28% | 36 |
| Tensor Cores | 184+28% | 144 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 9th gen (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 6th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 9th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 6th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB's 180W — a 20% difference. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 180W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 125.5+25% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB launched at $379 and now averages $379. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 47.2% less ($179 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 59.6 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 86.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $379-24% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-47% | $379 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+86% | 59.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | GB206 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | April 16 2025 |
| Ranking | #63 | #60 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
