FirePro M4170
VS
GeForce RTX 4070

FirePro M4170 vs GeForce RTX 4070

FirePro M4170

2015Core: 825 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro M4170 is positioned at rank #196 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro M4170

#86
Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550
95%
#87
A10G
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000
93%
#88
Tesla T4
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000
92%
#89
Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120
91%
#90
Quadro P5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400
87%
#181
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2530%
#196
FirePro M4170
MSRP: $200|Avg: $80
100%
#197
GRID K140Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $500
100%
#200
Radeon Pro Duo
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $799
95%
#201
P102-100
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
94%
#203
Quadro FX 2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
93%
#206
FirePro V3900
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
91%
#207
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
MSRP: $119|Avg: $89
91%
#208
Tesla K8
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
88%
#210
GRID K240Q
MSRP: $500|Avg: $40
87%
#211
FirePro M4150
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070

#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
112%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
111%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
111%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
110%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
109%
#43
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
108%
#44
GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
107%
#45
Radeon RX 7600 XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
107%
#46
GeForce RTX 2050
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
105%
#47
GeForce RTX 3080
MSRP: $699|Avg: $400
105%
#48
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $499|Avg: $449
103%
#49
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
MSRP: $549|Avg: $540
103%
#50
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
MSRP: $599|Avg: $600
102%
#51
Radeon RX 7800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $490
101%
#52
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $340
101%
#53
GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP: $599|Avg: $550
100%
#54
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
MSRP: $279|Avg: $380
99%
#55
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
MSRP: $470|Avg: $120
99%
#56
Arc A770
MSRP: $349|Avg: $280
97%
#57
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
MSRP: $289|Avg: $423
97%
#58
Arc A380
MSRP: $149|Avg: $119
95%
#59
Radeon RX 9070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
94%
#60
Radeon RX 7900 XT
MSRP: $899|Avg: $630
94%
#61
GeForce RTX 4080
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $800
84%
#62
Arc A310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
82%
#63
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
MSRP: $799|Avg: $800
81%
#64
Radeon RX 9070 XT
MSRP: $599|Avg: $700
79%
#65
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
MSRP: $749|Avg: $850
78%
#66
Radeon RX 6900 XT
MSRP: $999|Avg: $385
78%
#67
GeForce GTX 1630
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
75%
#68
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4070 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 4070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro M4170 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2204.7% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M4170.

InsightFirePro M4170GeForce RTX 4070
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2204.7%)
Leading raw performance (+2204.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (304mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $550 (vs $80), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 235.2% better value per dollar than the FirePro M4170.

InsightFirePro M4170GeForce RTX 4070
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+235.2%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($80)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M4170 and GeForce RTX 4070

AMD

FirePro M4170

The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro M4170 scores 1,168 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 2204.7%. The FirePro M4170 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4170) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 2475 MHz.

FeatureFirePro M4170GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score
1,168
26,919+2205%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
384
5888+1433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
29.15 TFLOPS+4117%
Boost Clock
900 MHz
2475 MHz+175%
ROPs
8
64+700%
TMUs
24
184+667%
L1 Cache
0.09 MB
5.8 MB+6344%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
36 MB+14300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro M4170 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureFirePro M4170GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4170 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M4170) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro M4170GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
12 GB+200%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6X
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
36 MB+14300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4170) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro M4170GeForce RTX 4070
DirectX
12
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4170) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: UVD vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4170) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

FeatureFirePro M4170GeForce RTX 4070
Encoder
VCE 1.0
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder
UVD
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4170 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The FirePro M4170 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4170) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 304mm, occupying 1 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro M4170GeForce RTX 4070
TDP
150W-25%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-46%
650W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
0mm
304mm
Height
0mm
137mm
Slots
1-67%
3
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80°C
Perf/Watt
7.8
134.6+1626%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro M4170 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The FirePro M4170 costs 85.5% less ($470 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.6 (FirePro M4170) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 234.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureFirePro M4170GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP
$200-67%
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$80-85%
$550
Performance per Dollar
14.6
48.9+235%
Codename
Opal
AD104
Release
April 23 2015
April 12 2023
Ranking
#838
#32