Firepro W4190M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Firepro W4190M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Firepro W4190M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Firepro W4190M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Firepro W4190M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Firepro W4190M is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Firepro W4190M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Firepro W4190M
The Firepro W4190M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Graphics Performance
The Firepro W4190M scores 1,168 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W4190M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 28 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 384 (Firepro W4190M) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Firepro W4190M) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168 | 1,172 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+20% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 0.768 TFLOPS+11% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1200 MHz+33% |
| ROPs | 8+100% | 4 |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Firepro W4190M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 carries 0 MB. Firepro W4190M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro W4190M and System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Firepro W4190M draws 30W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W — a 0% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W4190M) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 38.9 | 39.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Firepro W4190M (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Codename | Opal | Haswell GT3e |
| Release | November 12 2015 | May 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #836 | #835 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Firepro W4190M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200
