CPU
GPU
Firepro W4190M
Popular choices:
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Firepro W4190M is positioned at rank 45 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is on rank 403, so the Firepro W4190M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Firepro W4190M
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Firepro W4190M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Firepro W4190M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Generation 7.5 (2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Firepro W4190M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Firepro W4190M
The Firepro W4190M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Graphics Performance
The Firepro W4190M scores 1,168 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W4190M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 28 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 384 (Firepro W4190M) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Firepro W4190M) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168 | 1,172 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+20% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 0.768 TFLOPS+11% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1200 MHz+33% |
| ROPs | 8+100% | 4 |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Firepro W4190M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 0 MB. The Firepro W4190M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Firepro W4190M draws 30W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W — a 0% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W4190M) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 38.9 | 39.1 |
Value Analysis
The Firepro W4190M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $40 |
| Codename | Opal | Haswell GT3e |
| Release | November 12 2015 | May 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #836 | #835 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Firepro W4190M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200
