Firepro W4190M vs Radeon R9 M265X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Firepro W4190M vs Radeon R9 M265X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Firepro W4190M vs Radeon R9 M265X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Firepro W4190M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M265X

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Firepro W4190M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (1,168 vs 1,167), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Firepro W4190M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M265X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M265X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Firepro W4190M has the stronger long-term case.

Firepro W4190M vs Radeon R9 M265X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Firepro W4190M

The Firepro W4190M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

Radeon R9 M265X

The Radeon R9 M265X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,167 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Firepro W4190M scores 1,168 and the Radeon R9 M265X reaches 1,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W4190M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M265X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Firepro W4190M) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M265X). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Firepro W4190M) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M265X). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 625 MHz.

Feature	Firepro W4190M	Radeon R9 M265X
G3D Mark Score	1,168	1,167
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	0.8 TFLOPS+16%
Boost Clock	900 MHz+44%	625 MHz
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	96 KB	160 KB+67%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Firepro W4190M	Radeon R9 M265X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Firepro W4190M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M265X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M265X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro W4190M and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M265X.

Feature	Firepro W4190M	Radeon R9 M265X
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Firepro W4190M draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M265X's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Firepro W4190M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W4190M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M265X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Firepro W4190M	Radeon R9 M265X
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	38.9+149%	15.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Firepro W4190M (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	Firepro W4190M	Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP	—	$200
Codename	Opal	Venus
Release	November 12 2015	March 21 2014
Ranking	#836	#839

Search Firepro W4190M on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M265X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.