
Firepro W4190M vs Radeon HD 5750

Firepro W4190M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 5750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Firepro W4190M is positioned at rank 45 and the Radeon HD 5750 is on rank 143, so the Firepro W4190M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Firepro W4190M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 5750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Firepro W4190M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The Firepro W4190M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 5750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 5750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Firepro W4190M.
| Insight | Firepro W4190M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 5750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Firepro W4190M and Radeon HD 5750
Firepro W4190M
The Firepro W4190M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

Radeon HD 5750
The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.
Graphics Performance
The Firepro W4190M scores 1,168 and the Radeon HD 5750 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W4190M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 5750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Firepro W4190M) vs 720 (Radeon HD 5750). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Firepro W4190M) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750).
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168 | 1,169 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 720+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 1.008 TFLOPS+46% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 36+50% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+33% | 72 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Firepro W4190M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5750 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 5750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W4190M) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5750).
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD4 | — |
| Decoder | VCE1 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Firepro W4190M draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 5750's 86W — a 96.6% difference. The Firepro W4190M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W4190M) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-65% | 86W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 38.9+186% | 13.6 |
Value Analysis
The Firepro W4190M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $130 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $25 |
| Codename | Opal | Juniper |
| Release | November 12 2015 | October 13 2009 |
| Ranking | #836 | #834 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















