Firepro W4190M
VS
Radeon HD 5750

Firepro W4190M vs Radeon HD 5750

Firepro W4190M

2015Core: 825 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5750

2009Core: 700 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Firepro W4190M is positioned at rank 45 and the Radeon HD 5750 is on rank 143, so the Firepro W4190M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Firepro W4190M

#23
Intel Arc Pro B60
MSRP: $500|Avg: $450
95%
#24
Radeon PRO W7600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
94%
#25
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $625|Avg: $750
94%
#26
Radeon Pro Vega 48
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
86%
#30
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
506%
#45
Firepro W4190M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#48
Quadro K3100M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $400
98%
#50
Quadro K5000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $509
96%
#51
Radeon PRO W6300
MSRP: $200|Avg: $150
95%
#52
Quadro K4100M
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $261
95%
#58
Quadro K2000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
86%
#60
Intel Arc Pro A60
MSRP: $380|Avg: $380
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 5750

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
807%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
775%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
766%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
765%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
763%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
759%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
749%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
747%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
740%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
738%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
729%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
727%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
714%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
714%
#87
Radeon RX 7500
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
91%
#88
Radeon Ryzen 5 5500H
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
90%
#128
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
890%
#143
Radeon HD 5750
MSRP: $130|Avg: $25
100%
#145
Radeon HD 8330E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
97%
#146
Radeon HD 8670D
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
96%
#147
Radeon R7 A370
MSRP: $149|Avg: $51
96%
#148
Radeon HD 5770
MSRP: $159|Avg: $159
94%
#149
Radeon HD 4770
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
93%
#150
Radeon HD 8510G
MSRP: $45|Avg: $5
92%
#151
Radeon HD 8550G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
92%
#152
GeForce GT 635
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
91%
#154
Radeon R7 A8-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
90%
#156
Radeon HD 5670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
90%
#157
GeForce GT 740A
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
89%
#158
Radeon HD 7420G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Firepro W4190M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The Firepro W4190M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 5750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 5750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Firepro W4190M.

InsightFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 5750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Firepro W4190M and Radeon HD 5750

Firepro W4190M

The Firepro W4190M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 5750

The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.

Graphics Performance

The Firepro W4190M scores 1,168 and the Radeon HD 5750 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W4190M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 5750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Firepro W4190M) vs 720 (Radeon HD 5750). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Firepro W4190M) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750).

FeatureFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
G3D Mark Score
1,168
1,169
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
720+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
1.008 TFLOPS+46%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
36+50%
L1 Cache
96 KB+33%
72 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Firepro W4190M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5750 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 5750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W4190M) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5750).

FeatureFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
Encoder
UVD4
Decoder
VCE1
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Firepro W4190M draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 5750's 86W — a 96.6% difference. The Firepro W4190M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W4190M) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
TDP
30W-65%
86W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
38.9+186%
13.6
💰

Value Analysis

The Firepro W4190M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).

FeatureFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
MSRP
$130
Avg Price (30d)
$25
Codename
Opal
Juniper
Release
November 12 2015
October 13 2009
Ranking
#836
#834