Firepro W4190M vs FireStream 9250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Firepro W4190M vs FireStream 9250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Firepro W4190M vs FireStream 9250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Firepro W4190M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

FireStream 9250

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Firepro W4190M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (1,168 vs 1,165), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Firepro W4190M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FireStream 9250 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FireStream 9250 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Firepro W4190M has the stronger long-term case.

Firepro W4190M vs FireStream 9250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Firepro W4190M

The Firepro W4190M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

FireStream 9250

The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Firepro W4190M scores 1,168 and the FireStream 9250 reaches 1,165 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W4190M is built on GCN 1.0 while the FireStream 9250 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (Firepro W4190M) vs 800 (FireStream 9250). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Firepro W4190M) vs 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250).

Feature	Firepro W4190M	FireStream 9250
G3D Mark Score	1,168	1,165
Architecture	GCN 1.0	TeraScale
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	1 TFLOPS+45%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	96 KB	160 KB+67%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Firepro W4190M	FireStream 9250
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Firepro W4190M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the FireStream 9250 carries 1 GB. FireStream 9250 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro W4190M and 64-bit on the FireStream 9250.

Feature	Firepro W4190M	FireStream 9250
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (Firepro W4190M) vs 10.1 (FireStream 9250). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

Feature	Firepro W4190M	FireStream 9250
DirectX	12 (FL11_1)+19%	10.1
Vulkan	1.2	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	3+200%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD4 (Firepro W4190M) vs None (FireStream 9250). Decoder: VCE1 vs UVD 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W4190M) vs H.264,VC-1 (FireStream 9250).

Feature	Firepro W4190M	FireStream 9250
Encoder	UVD4	None
Decoder	VCE1	UVD 2.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Firepro W4190M draws 30W versus the FireStream 9250's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The Firepro W4190M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W4190M) vs 350W (FireStream 9250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 234mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs Unknown.

Feature	Firepro W4190M	FireStream 9250
TDP	30W-80%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	234mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	75°C	Unknown-100%
Perf/Watt	38.9+399%	7.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Firepro W4190M (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	Firepro W4190M	FireStream 9250
MSRP	—	$999
Codename	Opal	RV770
Release	November 12 2015	June 16 2008
Ranking	#836	#840

Search Firepro W4190M on Amazon

Search FireStream 9250 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.