Firepro W4190M vs GeForce GT 650M

Firepro W4190M

2015Core: 825 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 650M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Firepro W4190M vs GeForce GT 650M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Firepro W4190M vs GeForce GT 650M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Firepro W4190M

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 30W instead of 45W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GT 650M

2012

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50% higher power demand at 45W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 650M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (1,187 vs 1,168), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Firepro W4190M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 650M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 650M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Firepro W4190M has the stronger long-term case.

Firepro W4190M vs GeForce GT 650M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Firepro W4190M

The Firepro W4190M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 650M

The GeForce GT 650M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,187 points.

Graphics Performance

The Firepro W4190M scores 1,168 and the GeForce GT 650M reaches 1,187 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W4190M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 650M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Firepro W4190M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 650M). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Firepro W4190M) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 650M). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 950 MHz.

FeatureFirepro W4190MGeForce GT 650M
G3D Mark Score
1,168
1,187+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
0.7296 TFLOPS+6%
Boost Clock
900 MHz
950 MHz+6%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
96 KB+200%
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 650M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Firepro W4190M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirepro W4190MGeForce GT 650M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Firepro W4190M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 650M carries 2 GB. GeForce GT 650M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro W4190M and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 650M.

FeatureFirepro W4190MGeForce GT 650M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (Firepro W4190M) vs 12 (FL11_0) (GeForce GT 650M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureFirepro W4190MGeForce GT 650M
DirectX
12 (FL11_1)
12 (FL11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD4 (Firepro W4190M) vs NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 650M). Decoder: VCE1 vs VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W4190M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,MPEG-1/2 (GeForce GT 650M).

FeatureFirepro W4190MGeForce GT 650M
Encoder
UVD4
NVENC (Kepler)
Decoder
VCE1
VP5
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4,MPEG-1/2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Firepro W4190M draws 30W versus the GeForce GT 650M's 45W — a 40% difference. The Firepro W4190M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W4190M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 650M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureFirepro W4190MGeForce GT 650M
TDP
30W-33%
45W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
38.9+47%
26.4