Firepro W4190M
NVS 810
Firepro W4190M vs NVS 810 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Firepro W4190M vs NVS 810 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Firepro W4190M vs NVS 810: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Firepro W4190M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 68W, a 38W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
NVS 810
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($700 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌126.7% higher power demand at 68W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Firepro W4190M vs NVS 810 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Firepro W4190M
The Firepro W4190M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.
NVS 810
The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.
Graphics Performance
The Firepro W4190M scores 1,168 and the NVS 810 reaches 1,192 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W4190M is built on GCN 1.0 while the NVS 810 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Firepro W4190M) vs 512 (NVS 810). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Firepro W4190M) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168 | 1,192+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512 ×2+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2+53% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1033 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32 ×2+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 256 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Firepro W4190M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the NVS 810 carries 4 GB. NVS 810 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro W4190M and 64-bit on the NVS 810. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Firepro W4190M) vs 1 MB (NVS 810) — the NVS 810 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (Firepro W4190M) vs 12 (12_1) (NVS 810). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 8.
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 8+167% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD4 (Firepro W4190M) vs NVENC 5 (NVS 810). Decoder: VCE1 vs NVDEC 2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W4190M) vs H.264,H.265 (NVS 810).
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD4 | NVENC 5 |
| Decoder | VCE1 | NVDEC 2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Firepro W4190M draws 30W versus the NVS 810's 68W — a 77.6% difference. The Firepro W4190M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W4190M) vs 350W (NVS 810). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 198mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-56% | 68W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 198mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 38.9+122% | 17.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Firepro W4190M and NVS 810
