Firepro W4190M
Quadro K620M
Firepro W4190M vs Quadro K620M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Firepro W4190M vs Quadro K620M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Firepro W4190M vs Quadro K620M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Firepro W4190M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro K620M
2015Why buy it
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Firepro W4190M vs Quadro K620M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Firepro W4190M
The Firepro W4190M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.
Quadro K620M
The Quadro K620M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,159 points.
Graphics Performance
The Firepro W4190M scores 1,168 and the Quadro K620M reaches 1,159 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W4190M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro K620M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Firepro W4190M) vs 384 (Quadro K620M). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Firepro W4190M) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620M). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Quadro K620M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168 | 1,159 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 0.8632 TFLOPS+25% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1124 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24+50% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 128 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Quadro K620M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Firepro W4190M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K620M carries 4 GB. Quadro K620M gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Firepro W4190M and 64-bit on the Quadro K620M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Firepro W4190M) vs 1 MB (Quadro K620M) — the Quadro K620M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Quadro K620M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Firepro W4190M draws 30W versus the Quadro K620M's 30W — a 0% difference. The Quadro K620M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W4190M) vs 350W (Quadro K620M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Firepro W4190M | Quadro K620M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 38.9 | 38.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Firepro W4190M and Quadro K620M
