Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013Core: 200 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

2023Core: 450 MHzBoost: 750 MHz

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

2023

Why buy it

  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 12 (2021−2023) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2023 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (1,200 vs 1,172), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 22nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

Intel

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 450 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 24 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) uses Gen. 12, both on 22 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 24 (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 750 MHz.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics 5200UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
G3D Mark Score
1,172
1,200+2%
Architecture
Generation 7.5
Gen. 12
Process Node
22 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
320+1233%
24
Boost Clock
1200 MHz+60%
750 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Pro Graphics 5200UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and System on the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N).

FeatureIris Pro Graphics 5200UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)'s 15W — a 66.7% difference. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 1W (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics 5200UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
TDP
30W
15W-50%
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Perf/Watt
39.1
80.0+105%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 came in at $150, while the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)) — the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) (2023 vs 2013).

FeatureIris Pro Graphics 5200UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
MSRP
$150
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
7.8
Infinity
Codename
Haswell GT3e
Alder Lake Xe
Release
May 27 2013
January 3 2023
Ranking
#835
#914

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.