Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs NVS 810

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs NVS 810 Performance Spectrum

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Shared System RAM 30

1,172

0.0%

1,192

+1.7%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 4060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs NVS 810 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs NVS 810: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
✅Delivers 358.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.8 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 68W, a 38W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

NVS 810

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so NVS 810 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
366.7% HIGHER MSRP
$700 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($700 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌126.7% higher power demand at 68W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

NVS 810 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (1,192 vs 1,172), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

NVS 810 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $550 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $700, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 358.8% (7.8 vs 1.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, NVS 810 has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs NVS 810 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

NVS 810

The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the NVS 810 reaches 1,192 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the NVS 810 uses Maxwell, both on 22 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 512 (NVS 810). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	NVS 810
G3D Mark Score	1,172	1,192+2%
Architecture	Generation 7.5	Maxwell
Process Node	22 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	320	512 ×2+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS	1.058 TFLOPS ×2+38%
Boost Clock	1200 MHz+16%	1033 MHz
ROPs	4	16 ×2+300%
TMUs	40+25%	32 ×2

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	NVS 810
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the NVS 810 carries 4 GB. NVS 810 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 64-bit on the NVS 810.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	NVS 810
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the NVS 810's 68W — a 77.6% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 350W (NVS 810). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	NVS 810
TDP	30W-56%	68W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	—	198mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	39.1+123%	17.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 came in at $150, while the NVS 810 launched at $700. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 was 78.6% cheaper ($550 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 1.7 (NVS 810) — the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers 358.8% better value. The newer card here is NVS 810 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	NVS 810
MSRP	$150-79%	$700
Performance per Dollar	7.8+359%	1.7
Codename	Haswell GT3e	GM107
Release	May 27 2013	November 4 2015
Ranking	#835	#826

Search Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on Amazon

Search NVS 810 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.