Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs NVS 810

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

30

1,172

0.0%

1,192

+1.7%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 4060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is positioned at rank 403 and the NVS 810 is on rank 309, so the NVS 810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics 5200

#392

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1390%

#394

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1260%

#395

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1257%

#399

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1143%

#400

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1135%

#402

Mobility Radeon HD 5000

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

100%

#403

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

100%

#405

Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

99%

#406

Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

96%

#407

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

96%

#408

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

94%

#409

Radeon R7 M260X

MSRP: $139|Avg: $35

93%

#410

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6570 Dual

MSRP: $120|Avg: $25

93%

#411

Intel UHD Graphics 615

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

92%

#412

Radeon R7 A365

MSRP: $109|Avg: $55

92%

#413

Radeon 3015e

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

92%

#414

Radeon HD 7620G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

91%

#415

Radeon R9 M390X

MSRP: $550|Avg: $120

91%

#416

Arc 8-Core iGPU

MSRP: $503|Avg: $400

89%

#417

Mobility Radeon HD 4670

MSRP: $67|Avg: $20

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 810

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

92%

#294

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

8690%

#309

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

100%

#310

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

99%

#311

Quadro 2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

96%

#312

FirePro 3D V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30

96%

#313

Quadro K5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60

94%

#314

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

93%

#315

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

92%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

91%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

90%

#319

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

89%

#320

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

89%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

89%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

87%

#323

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

84%

#324

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The NVS 810 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.

Insight	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	NVS 810
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Generation 7.5 (2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $80), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 96.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	NVS 810
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+96.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($40)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Benchmark Check

NVS 810 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and NVS 810

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

NVS 810

The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the NVS 810 reaches 1,192 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the NVS 810 uses Maxwell, both on 22 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 512 (NVS 810). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	NVS 810
G3D Mark Score	1,172	1,192+2%
Architecture	Generation 7.5	Maxwell
Process Node	22 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	320	512 ×2+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS	1.058 TFLOPS ×2+38%
Boost Clock	1200 MHz+16%	1033 MHz
ROPs	4	16 ×2+300%
TMUs	40+25%	32 ×2

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	NVS 810
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the NVS 810 has 4 GB. The NVS 810 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	NVS 810
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the NVS 810's 68W — a 77.6% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 350W (NVS 810). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	NVS 810
TDP	30W-56%	68W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	—	198mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	39.1+123%	17.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the NVS 810 launched at $700 and now averages $80. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 costs 50% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.3 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 14.9 (NVS 810) — the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers 96.6% better value. The NVS 810 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).