Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R7 +8G

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013Core: 200 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 +8G

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 915 MHz

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R7 +8G Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R7 +8G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013

Why buy it

  • βœ…Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    206.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 24.3 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Radeon R7 +8G

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $101 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 211.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • βœ…100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • βœ…Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 +8G is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 +8G is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (1,191 vs 1,172), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 +8G is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 +8G makes the most sense to buy today. It is $101 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 211.1% (24.3 vs 7.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R7 +8G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 +8G

The Radeon R7 +8G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,191 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the Radeon R7 +8G reaches 1,191 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the Radeon R7 +8G uses GCN 1.0, both on 22 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 640 (Radeon R7 +8G). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 1.171 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 +8G). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 915 MHz.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics 5200Radeon R7 +8G
G3D Mark Score
1,172
1,191+2%
Architecture
Generation 7.5
GCN 1.0
Process Node
22 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320
640+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS
1.171 TFLOPS+52%
Boost Clock
1200 MHz+31%
915 MHz
ROPs
4
16+300%
TMUs
40
40
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Pro Graphics 5200Radeon R7 +8G
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 +8G carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 +8G gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 +8G.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics 5200Radeon R7 +8G
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 +8G's 30W β€” a 0% difference. The Radeon R7 +8G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 350W (Radeon R7 +8G). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics 5200Radeon R7 +8G
TDP
30W
30W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
β€”
168mm
Height
β€”
111mm
Slots
β€”
1
Temp (Load)
β€”
75
Perf/Watt
39.1
39.7+2%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 came in at $150, while the Radeon R7 +8G launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R7 +8G was 67.3% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 24.3 (Radeon R7 +8G) β€” the Radeon R7 +8G offers 211.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 +8G (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureIris Pro Graphics 5200Radeon R7 +8G
MSRP
$150
$49-67%
Performance per Dollar
7.8
24.3+212%
Codename
Haswell GT3e
Tropo
Release
May 27 2013
May 5 2015
Ranking
#835
#737

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.