Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 7750M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 7750M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 7750M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 7.5 (2013) on 22nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 7750M

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 7750M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 7750M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (1,191 vs 1,172), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 7750M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 7750M has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 7750M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

Radeon HD 7750M

The Radeon HD 7750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,191 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the Radeon HD 7750M reaches 1,191 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the Radeon HD 7750M uses GCN 1.0, both on 22 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750M).

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	Radeon HD 7750M
G3D Mark Score	1,172	1,191+2%
Architecture	Generation 7.5	GCN 1.0
Process Node	22 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	320	512+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS+30%	0.5888 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	16+300%
TMUs	40+25%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	Radeon HD 7750M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750M carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 7750M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and System on the Radeon HD 7750M.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	Radeon HD 7750M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7750M's 28W — a 6.9% difference. The Radeon HD 7750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7750M). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	Radeon HD 7750M
TDP	30W	28W-7%
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	1x 6-pin
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	39.1	42.5+9%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics 5200 (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 5200	Radeon HD 7750M
MSRP	$150	—
Codename	Haswell GT3e	Chelsea
Release	May 27 2013	April 24 2012
Ranking	#835	#827

Search Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7750M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.