Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 7750M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7750M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is positioned at rank 403 and the Radeon HD 7750M is on rank 353, so the Radeon HD 7750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7750M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Generation 7.5 (2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7750M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 7750M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Radeon HD 7750M
The Radeon HD 7750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,191 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the Radeon HD 7750M reaches 1,191 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the Radeon HD 7750M uses GCN 1.0, both on 22 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750M).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 1,191+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 512+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+30% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 16+300% |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750M has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 7750M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7750M's 28W — a 6.9% difference. The Radeon HD 7750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7750M). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 28W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 42.5+9% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | — |
| Codename | Haswell GT3e | Chelsea |
| Release | May 27 2013 | April 24 2012 |
| Ranking | #835 | #827 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 7750M
