FirePro V5800 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

FirePro V5800

2010Core: 690 MHz
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013Core: 200 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro V5800 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V5800 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V5800

2010

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro V5800 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 219.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $479 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 146.7% higher power demand at 74W vs 30W.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $329 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
  • Delivers 216.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.8 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 74W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro V5800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (1,184 vs 1,172), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V5800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $329 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $479, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 216.1% (7.8 vs 2.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V5800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V5800 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V5800

The FirePro V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $479.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V5800 scores 1,184 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 40 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V5800) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V5800) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200).

FeatureFirePro V5800Iris Pro Graphics 5200
G3D Mark Score
1,184+1%
1,172
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Generation 7.5
Process Node
40 nm
22 nm
Shading Units
800+150%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.104 TFLOPS+44%
0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+300%
4
TMUs
40
40

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V5800Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V5800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 carries 0 MB. FirePro V5800 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V5800 and System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.

FeatureFirePro V5800Iris Pro Graphics 5200
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V5800 draws 74W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W — a 84.6% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5800) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureFirePro V5800Iris Pro Graphics 5200
TDP
74W
30W-59%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
59°C
Perf/Watt
16.0
39.1+144%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V5800 came in at $479, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 was 68.7% cheaper ($329 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro V5800) vs 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) — the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers 212% better value. The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics 5200 (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro V5800Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP
$479
$150-69%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
7.8+212%
Codename
Juniper
Haswell GT3e
Release
April 26 2010
May 27 2013
Ranking
#780
#835

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.