
FirePro V5800

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
FirePro V5800 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V5800 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V5800 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V5800
2010Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro V5800 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌219.3% HIGHER MSRP$479 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌146.7% higher power demand at 74W vs 30W.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $329 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 216.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.8 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 74W, a 44W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V5800 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V5800
The FirePro V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $479.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V5800 scores 1,184 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 40 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V5800) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V5800) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,184+1% | 1,172 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Generation 7.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 22 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+150% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS+44% | 0.768 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+300% | 4 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V5800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 carries 0 MB. FirePro V5800 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V5800 and System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V5800 draws 74W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W — a 84.6% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5800) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 30W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 59°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 16.0 | 39.1+144% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V5800 came in at $479, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 was 68.7% cheaper ($329 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro V5800) vs 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) — the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers 212% better value. The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics 5200 (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $479 | $150-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 7.8+212% |
| Codename | Juniper | Haswell GT3e |
| Release | April 26 2010 | May 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #780 | #835 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















