
FirePro V5800 vs Radeon HD 7750M

FirePro V5800
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7750M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro V5800 is positioned at rank 269 and the Radeon HD 7750M is on rank 353, so the FirePro V5800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5800
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7750M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V5800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro V5800 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7750M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V5800 and Radeon HD 7750M

FirePro V5800
The FirePro V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $479.

Radeon HD 7750M
The Radeon HD 7750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,191 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V5800 scores 1,184 and the Radeon HD 7750M reaches 1,191 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 7750M uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V5800) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750M). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V5800) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750M).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,184 | 1,191 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+56% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS+88% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 128 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V5800 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750M has 2 GB. The FirePro V5800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V5800) vs 12 (Radeon HD 7750M). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (FirePro V5800) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750M). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V5800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon HD 7750M).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V5800 draws 74W versus the Radeon HD 7750M's 28W — a 90.2% difference. The Radeon HD 7750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7750M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 59°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 28W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 59°C-21% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 16.0 | 42.5+166% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7750M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $479 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | — |
| Codename | Juniper | Chelsea |
| Release | April 26 2010 | April 24 2012 |
| Ranking | #780 | #827 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












