FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M270X

FirePro V5800

2010Core: 690 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M270X

2014Core: 725 MHzBoost: 775 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M270X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M270X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V5800

2010

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 91.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $479 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M270X

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $229 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
  • Delivers 94.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M270X is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (1,204 vs 1,184), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V5800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M270X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $229 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $479, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 94.8% (4.8 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M270X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V5800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M270X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V5800

The FirePro V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $479.

AMD

Radeon R9 M270X

The Radeon R9 M270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,204 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V5800 scores 1,184 and the Radeon R9 M270X reaches 1,204 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R9 M270X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V5800) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M270X). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V5800) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M270X).

FeatureFirePro V5800Radeon R9 M270X
G3D Mark Score
1,184
1,204+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800+25%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.104 TFLOPS+11%
0.992 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
80 KB
160 KB+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V5800Radeon R9 M270X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V5800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M270X.

FeatureFirePro V5800Radeon R9 M270X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V5800 draws 74W versus the Radeon R9 M270X's 75W — a 1.3% difference. The FirePro V5800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5800) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M270X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureFirePro V5800Radeon R9 M270X
TDP
74W-1%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
59°C
Perf/Watt
16.0
16.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V5800 came in at $479, while the Radeon R9 M270X launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M270X was 47.8% cheaper ($229 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro V5800) vs 4.8 (Radeon R9 M270X) — the Radeon R9 M270X offers 92% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M270X (2014 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro V5800Radeon R9 M270X
MSRP
$479
$250-48%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
4.8+92%
Codename
Juniper
Venus
Release
April 26 2010
March 21 2014
Ranking
#780
#819

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.