
FirePro V5800 vs Quadro M500M

FirePro V5800
Popular choices:

Quadro M500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro V5800 is positioned at rank 269 and the Quadro M500M is on rank 31, so the Quadro M500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5800
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M500M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro M500M is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The Quadro M500M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V5800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V5800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M500M.
| Insight | FirePro V5800 | Quadro M500M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro V5800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V5800 and Quadro M500M

FirePro V5800
The FirePro V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $479.

Quadro M500M
The Quadro M500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 27 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V5800 scores 1,184 and the Quadro M500M reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro M500M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V5800) vs 384 (Quadro M500M). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V5800) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro M500M).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Quadro M500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,184+1% | 1,172 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS+28% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+150% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 128 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Quadro M500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V5800 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M500M has 2 GB. The FirePro V5800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro V5800) vs 1 MB (Quadro M500M) — the Quadro M500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Quadro M500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V5800 draws 74W versus the Quadro M500M's 30W — a 84.6% difference. The Quadro M500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5800) vs 350W (Quadro M500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Quadro M500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 30W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 59°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 16.0 | 39.1+144% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M500M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Quadro M500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $479 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | — |
| Codename | Juniper | GM108 |
| Release | April 26 2010 | April 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #780 | #833 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














