
FirePro V5800 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

FirePro V5800
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro V5800 is positioned at rank #269 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5800
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V5800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V5800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro V5800 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V5800 and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

FirePro V5800
The FirePro V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $479.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 500 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V5800 scores 1,184 and the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V5800) vs 64 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,184 | 1,200+1% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+1150% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V5800 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has 0 MB. The FirePro V5800 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V5800) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (12_1)+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (FirePro V5800) vs QuickSync (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V5800) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V5800 draws 74W versus the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)'s 7W — a 165.4% difference. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5800) vs 1W (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 59°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 7W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 59°C-21% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 16.0 | 171.4+971% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V5800 launched at $479 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 78.9 (FirePro V5800) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) — the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $479 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 78.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | Juniper | Lakefield GT2 |
| Release | April 26 2010 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #780 | #893 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















