
FirePro V5800

Radeon R7 +8G
FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R7 +8G Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R7 +8G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R7 +8G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V5800
2010Why buy it
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌877.6% HIGHER MSRP$479 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 24.3 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌146.7% higher power demand at 74W vs 30W.
- ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.
Radeon R7 +8G
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 883.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 74W, a 44W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R7 +8G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V5800
The FirePro V5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $479.

Radeon R7 +8G
The Radeon R7 +8G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,191 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V5800 scores 1,184 and the Radeon R7 +8G reaches 1,191 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 +8G uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V5800) vs 640 (Radeon R7 +8G). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V5800) vs 1.171 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 +8G).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Radeon R7 +8G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,184 | 1,191 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+25% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS | 1.171 TFLOPS+6% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 160 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Radeon R7 +8G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V5800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 +8G carries 512 MB. FirePro V5800 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V5800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 +8G.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Radeon R7 +8G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V5800) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 +8G). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Radeon R7 +8G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (11_1)+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (FirePro V5800) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 +8G). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V5800) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 +8G).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Radeon R7 +8G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V5800 draws 74W versus the Radeon R7 +8G's 30W — a 84.6% difference. The Radeon R7 +8G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5800) vs 350W (Radeon R7 +8G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 59°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Radeon R7 +8G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 30W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 59°C-21% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 16.0 | 39.7+148% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V5800 came in at $479, while the Radeon R7 +8G launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R7 +8G was 89.8% cheaper ($430 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro V5800) vs 24.3 (Radeon R7 +8G) — the Radeon R7 +8G offers 872% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 +8G (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro V5800 | Radeon R7 +8G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $479 | $49-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 24.3+872% |
| Codename | Juniper | Tropo |
| Release | April 26 2010 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #780 | #737 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















