GeForce GT 640 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GeForce GT 640
Popular choices:
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 640 is positioned at rank 107 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is on rank 403, so the GeForce GT 640 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 640
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 640 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 640 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Generation 7.5 (2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 25.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 640 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+25.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 640 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GeForce GT 640
The GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points. Launch price was $99.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 640 scores 1,169 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640 is built on Kepler while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 28 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200).
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,169 | 1,172 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 7.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+20% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6927 TFLOPS | 0.768 TFLOPS+11% |
| ROPs | 16+300% | 4 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 640 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 0 MB. The GeForce GT 640 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 640 draws 65W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W — a 73.7% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 30W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.0 | 39.1+117% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 640 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150 and now averages $40. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.4 (GeForce GT 640) vs 29.3 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) — the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers 25.2% better value. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 640 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-34% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $40-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.4 | 29.3+25% |
| Codename | GK107 | Haswell GT3e |
| Release | June 5 2012 | May 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #837 | #835 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 640 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200
