GeForce GT 640 vs Quadro M500M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640

2012Core: 902 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M500M

2016Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

GeForce GT 640 vs Quadro M500M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 640 vs Quadro M500M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 640 vs Quadro M500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 640

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro M500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 116.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 30W.

Quadro M500M

2016

Why buy it

  • 48.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 30W instead of 65W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M500M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 48.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (1,172 vs 1,169), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 640 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 640 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro M500M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 640 vs Quadro M500M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640

The GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points. Launch price was $99.

NVIDIA

Quadro M500M

The Quadro M500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 27 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640 scores 1,169 and the Quadro M500M reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640 is built on Kepler while the Quadro M500M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640) vs 384 (Quadro M500M). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro M500M).

FeatureGeForce GT 640Quadro M500M
G3D Mark Score
1,169
1,172
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6927 TFLOPS
0.8632 TFLOPS+25%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+100%
16
L1 Cache
32 KB
128 KB+300%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 640 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M500M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 640Quadro M500M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 640 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M500M carries 2 GB. GeForce GT 640 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 640 and 64-bit on the Quadro M500M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 640) vs 1 MB (Quadro M500M) — the Quadro M500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 640Quadro M500M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640 draws 65W versus the Quadro M500M's 30W — a 73.7% difference. The Quadro M500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640) vs 350W (Quadro M500M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 640Quadro M500M
TDP
65W
30W-54%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
60°C
Perf/Watt
18.0
39.1+117%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M500M (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 640Quadro M500M
MSRP
$99
Codename
GK107
GM108
Release
June 5 2012
April 27 2016
Ranking
#837
#833

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.