GeForce GT 640 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640

2012Core: 902 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

2020Core: 200 MHzBoost: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 640 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 640 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 640

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 640 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 828.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 7W.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 7W instead of 65W, a 58W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (1,200 vs 1,169), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 640 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 640 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 640 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640

The GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points. Launch price was $99.

Intel

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 500 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640 scores 1,169 and the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640 is built on Kepler while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640) vs 64 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)).

FeatureGeForce GT 640UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
G3D Mark Score
1,169
1,200+3%
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
384+500%
64

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 640 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 640UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 640 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 640 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 640 and System on the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU).

FeatureGeForce GT 640UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 640UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
DirectX
11.0
12 (12_1)+9%
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs QuickSync (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 640) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)).

FeatureGeForce GT 640UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Encoder
NVENC 1.0
QuickSync
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
QuickSync
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640 draws 65W versus the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)'s 7W — a 161.1% difference. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640) vs 1W (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 75.

FeatureGeForce GT 640UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
TDP
65W
7W-89%
Recommended PSU
300W
1W-100%
Power Connector
None
Integrated
Length
145mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
60°C-20%
75
Perf/Watt
18.0
171.4+852%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 640 came in at $99, while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) was 100+% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.8 (GeForce GT 640) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) — the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) (2020 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 640UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
MSRP
$99
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
11.8
Infinity
Codename
GK107
Lakefield GT2
Release
June 5 2012
May 28 2020
Ranking
#837
#893

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.