G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 640 vs GeForce GTX 295 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 640 vs GeForce GTX 295: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 640

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 391.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅128.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 289W, a 224W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 267mm, a 122mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 295 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 295

2009

Why buy it

✅86.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
404% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌344.6% higher power demand at 289W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 295 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 86.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (1,198 vs 1,169), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 640 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2009. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 640 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $400 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 391.8% (11.8 vs 2.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 295 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 640 vs GeForce GTX 295 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 640

The GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points. Launch price was $99.

GeForce GTX 295

The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640 scores 1,169 and the GeForce GTX 295 reaches 1,198 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 295 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640) vs 480 (GeForce GTX 295). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640) vs 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 295).

Feature	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 295
G3D Mark Score	1,169	1,198+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384	480 ×2+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6927 TFLOPS+16%	0.5962 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs	16	28 ×2+75%
TMUs	32	80 ×2+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB+14%	224 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 295
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 640 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 295 carries 2 GB. GeForce GT 640 gives you 128.6% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 640 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 295. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 640) vs 224 KB (GeForce GTX 295) — the GeForce GT 640 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 295
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+129%	1.75 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB+14%	224 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 295). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 295
DirectX	11.0	11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL	4.5+36%	3.3
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 295). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 640) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 295).

Feature	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 295
Encoder	NVENC 1.0	PureVideo HD VP2
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640 draws 65W versus the GeForce GTX 295's 289W — a 126.6% difference. The GeForce GT 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640) vs 680W (GeForce GTX 295). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 95°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 295
TDP	65W-78%	289W
Recommended PSU	300W-56%	680W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length	145mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	60°C-37%	95°C
Perf/Watt	18.0+339%	4.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 640 came in at $99, while the GeForce GTX 295 launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce GT 640 was 80.2% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.8 (GeForce GT 640) vs 2.4 (GeForce GTX 295) — the GeForce GT 640 offers 391.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 640 (2012 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce GT 640	GeForce GTX 295
MSRP	$99-80%	$499
Performance per Dollar	11.8+392%	2.4
Codename	GK107	GT200B
Release	June 5 2012	January 8 2009
Ranking	#837	#816

Search GeForce GT 640 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 295 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.