GeForce GT 640
VS
Firepro W4190M

GeForce GT 640 vs Firepro W4190M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640

2012Core: 902 MHz
VS

Firepro W4190M

2015Core: 825 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 640 is positioned at rank 107 and the Firepro W4190M is on rank 45, so the Firepro W4190M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 640

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
614%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
590%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
583%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
582%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
581%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
578%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
570%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
568%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
563%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
562%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
555%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
554%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
544%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
543%
#92
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
677%
#107
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
100%
#108
Radeon R7 250
MSRP: $89|Avg: $25
100%
#109
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
100%
#111
Radeon HD 8550D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#112
Radeon 520
MSRP: $78|Avg: $78
95%
#113
Radeon HD 4810
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
94%
#115
GeForce 605
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
93%
#116
Radeon HD 8410G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
92%
#117
RADEON HD6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
#118
Moore Threads MTT S30
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
89%
#119
Radeon 535
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
89%
#122
GeForce GTS 450
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Firepro W4190M

#23
Intel Arc Pro B60
MSRP: $500|Avg: $450
95%
#24
Radeon PRO W7600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
94%
#25
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $625|Avg: $750
94%
#26
Radeon Pro Vega 48
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
86%
#30
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
506%
#45
Firepro W4190M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#48
Quadro K3100M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $400
98%
#50
Quadro K5000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $509
96%
#51
Radeon PRO W6300
MSRP: $200|Avg: $150
95%
#52
Quadro K4100M
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $261
95%
#58
Quadro K2000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
86%
#60
Intel Arc Pro A60
MSRP: $380|Avg: $380
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 640 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Firepro W4190M.

InsightGeForce GT 640Firepro W4190M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 640 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 640 and Firepro W4190M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640

The GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points. Launch price was $99.

Firepro W4190M

The Firepro W4190M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640 scores 1,169 and the Firepro W4190M reaches 1,168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640 is built on Kepler while the Firepro W4190M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640) vs 384 (Firepro W4190M). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (Firepro W4190M).

FeatureGeForce GT 640Firepro W4190M
G3D Mark Score
1,169
1,168
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6927 TFLOPS
0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
32 KB
96 KB+200%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 640Firepro W4190M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 640 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Firepro W4190M has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 640 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 640Firepro W4190M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Firepro W4190M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 640Firepro W4190M
DirectX
11.0
12 (FL11_1)+9%
Vulkan
1.1
1.2+9%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 640) vs UVD4 (Firepro W4190M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs VCE1. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 640) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W4190M).

FeatureGeForce GT 640Firepro W4190M
Encoder
NVENC 1.0
UVD4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
VCE1
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640 draws 65W versus the Firepro W4190M's 30W — a 73.7% difference. The Firepro W4190M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 640) vs 350W (Firepro W4190M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 640Firepro W4190M
TDP
65W
30W-54%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
60°C-20%
75°C
Perf/Watt
18.0
38.9+116%
💰

Value Analysis

The Firepro W4190M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 640Firepro W4190M
MSRP
$99
Avg Price (30d)
$50
Codename
GK107
Opal
Release
June 5 2012
November 12 2015
Ranking
#837
#836