Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is positioned at rank 403 and the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is on rank 109, so the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Generation 7.5 (2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $99), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 148.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+148.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($99) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2013. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1046 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 49W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 reaches 1,168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 uses Kepler 2.0, both on 22 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 384 (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 0.8033 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 1,168 |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Process Node | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 384+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 0.8033 TFLOPS+5% |
| ROPs | 4 | 8+100% |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2's 49W — a 48.1% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 300W (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-39% | 49W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65 |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+64% | 23.8 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 launched at $99 and now averages $99. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 costs 59.6% less ($59 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.3 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 11.8 (GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2) — the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers 148.3% better value.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $99-34% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-60% | $99 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3+148% | 11.8 |
| Codename | Haswell GT3e | GK208 |
| Release | May 27 2013 | May 29 2013 |
| Ranking | #835 | #786 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
