CPU
GPU
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 260
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is positioned at rank 403 and the GeForce GTX 260 is on rank 293, so the GeForce GTX 260 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 260
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 260 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (896 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce GTX 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Generation 7.5 (2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $449), it costs 91% less, resulting in a 996.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce GTX 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+996.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($449) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce GTX 260
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
GeForce GTX 260
The GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 182W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 and the GeForce GTX 260 reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the GeForce GTX 260 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 22 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 260). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 0.4769 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 260).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce GTX 260 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 1,200+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 22 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 320+67% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+61% | 0.4769 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 28+600% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce GTX 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 260 has 896 MB. The GeForce GTX 260 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce GTX 260 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.875 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 260's 182W — a 143.4% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 260). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce GTX 260 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-84% | 182W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+492% | 6.6 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 260 launched at $449 and now averages $449. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 costs 91.1% less ($409 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.3 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 2.7 (GeForce GTX 260) — the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers 985.2% better value. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce GTX 260 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-67% | $449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-91% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3+985% | 2.7 |
| Codename | Haswell GT3e | GT200 |
| Release | May 27 2013 | June 16 2008 |
| Ranking | #835 | #821 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce GTX 260
