Radeon HD 7730M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

AMD

Radeon HD 7730M

2013Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 7730M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 7730M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 7730M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 7730M

2013

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 47W instead of 300W, a 253W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

2025

Why buy it

  • 100.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 538.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 47W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 100.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (806 vs 786), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Radeon HD 7730M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 7730M

The Radeon HD 7730M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 786 points. Launch price was $59.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7730M scores 786 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 reaches 806 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7730M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 7730M) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7730M) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700).

FeatureRadeon HD 7730MRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
G3D Mark Score
786
806+3%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Bristol Ridge
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
384
4096+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6144 TFLOPS
47.84 TFLOPS+7686%
ROPs
8
128+1500%
TMUs
24
256+967%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7730MRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7730M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 7730M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 7730M and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7730M) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 7730MRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
System
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7730M draws 47W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700's 300W — a 145.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7730M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7730M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 7730MRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
TDP
47W-84%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
16.7+519%
2.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 (2025 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 7730MRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
MSRP
$169
Codename
Cape Verde
Navi 48
Release
May 1 2013
July 23 2025
Ranking
#841
#23

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.