Radeon HD 7850
VS
GRID M60-8Q

Radeon HD 7850 vs GRID M60-8Q

AMD

Radeon HD 7850

2012Boost: 1000 MHz
VS

GRID M60-8Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7850 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M60-8Q.

InsightRadeon HD 7850GRID M60-8Q
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 7850 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7850 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $500), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 903.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 7850GRID M60-8Q
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+903.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7850 and GRID M60-8Q

AMD

Radeon HD 7850

The Radeon HD 7850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,897 points. Launch price was $249.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-8Q

The GRID M60-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,884 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7850 scores 3,897 and the GRID M60-8Q reaches 3,884 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7850 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID M60-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon HD 7850) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-8Q). Raw compute: 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7850) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-8Q). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 7850GRID M60-8Q
G3D Mark Score
3,897
3,884
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.761 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+174%
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1178 MHz+18%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
64
128+100%
L1 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7850GRID M60-8Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 7850) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-8Q) — the GRID M60-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 7850GRID M60-8Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7850 draws 130W versus the GRID M60-8Q's 225W — a 53.5% difference. The Radeon HD 7850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 7850) vs 350W (GRID M60-8Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 7850GRID M60-8Q
TDP
130W-42%
225W
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
210mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
30.0+73%
17.3
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7850 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GRID M60-8Q launched at $0 and now averages $500. The Radeon HD 7850 costs 90% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 77.9 (Radeon HD 7850) vs 7.8 (GRID M60-8Q) — the Radeon HD 7850 offers 898.7% better value. The GRID M60-8Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 7850GRID M60-8Q
MSRP
$249
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$50-90%
$500
Performance per Dollar
77.9+899%
7.8
Codename
Pitcairn
GM204
Release
March 5 2012
August 30 2015
Ranking
#503
#505