
Radeon HD 7870

Radeon Pro 465
Radeon HD 7870 vs Radeon Pro 465 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 7870 vs Radeon Pro 465 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 7870 vs Radeon Pro 465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 7870
2012Why buy it
- ✅16.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.
Radeon Pro 465
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7870 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌43.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 13.1 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7870 vs Radeon Pro 465 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 7870
The Radeon HD 7870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,568 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro 465
The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7870 scores 4,568 and the Radeon Pro 465 reaches 4,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7870 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro 465 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 7870) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465). Raw compute: 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7870) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7870 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,568 | 4,538 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+25% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.56 TFLOPS+38% | 1.858 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+25% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7870 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon HD 7870 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 465. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 7870) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) — the Radeon Pro 465 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7870 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7870 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro 465's 35W — a 140.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 7870) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 465). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7870 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 35W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.8 | 129.7+469% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 7870 came in at $349, while the Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7870 was 30.2% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.1 (Radeon HD 7870) vs 9.1 (Radeon Pro 465) — the Radeon HD 7870 offers 44% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 465 (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7870 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-30% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.1+44% | 9.1 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Baffin |
| Release | March 5 2012 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #460 | #547 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















