Radeon HD 7870 vs Radeon Pro 465

AMD

Radeon HD 7870

2012Core: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 465

2016Core: 850 MHzBoost: 907 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 7870 vs Radeon Pro 465 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 7870 vs Radeon Pro 465 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 7870 vs Radeon Pro 465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 7870

2012

Why buy it

  • 16.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 44.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 465

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7870 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 43.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 13.1 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 7870 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 16.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (4,568 vs 4,538), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 7870 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7870 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $151 cheaper on MSRP at $349 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 44.2% (13.1 vs 9.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon HD 7870 vs Radeon Pro 465 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 7870

The Radeon HD 7870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,568 points. Launch price was $349.

AMD

Radeon Pro 465

The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7870 scores 4,568 and the Radeon Pro 465 reaches 4,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7870 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro 465 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 7870) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465). Raw compute: 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7870) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465).

FeatureRadeon HD 7870Radeon Pro 465
G3D Mark Score
4,568
4,538
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1280+25%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.56 TFLOPS+38%
1.858 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+25%
64
L1 Cache
320 KB+25%
256 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7870Radeon Pro 465
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon HD 7870 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 465. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 7870) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) — the Radeon Pro 465 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 7870Radeon Pro 465
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7870 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro 465's 35W — a 140.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 7870) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 465). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 7870Radeon Pro 465
TDP
200W
35W-83%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
22.8
129.7+469%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 7870 came in at $349, while the Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7870 was 30.2% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.1 (Radeon HD 7870) vs 9.1 (Radeon Pro 465) — the Radeon HD 7870 offers 44% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 465 (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 7870Radeon Pro 465
MSRP
$349-30%
$500
Performance per Dollar
13.1+44%
9.1
Codename
Pitcairn
Baffin
Release
March 5 2012
October 30 2016
Ranking
#460
#547

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.