Radeon HD 7870M
VS
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Radeon HD 7870M vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

AMD

Radeon HD 7870M

2012Core: 800 MHz
VS
Intel

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 7870M is positioned at rank #122 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7870M

#112
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
288%
#114
261%
#115
261%
#119
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
237%
#120
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
235%
#122
Radeon HD 7870M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#123
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#126
GeForce GT 550M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#131
GeForce GT 335M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 7870M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 7870MIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7870M and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

AMD

Radeon HD 7870M

The Radeon HD 7870M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,507 points.

Intel

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7870M scores 1,507 and the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 reaches 1,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7870M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 7870M) vs 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7870M) vs 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200).

FeatureRadeon HD 7870MIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
G3D Mark Score
1,507
1,538+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Generation 8.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640+67%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS+21%
0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+167%
6
TMUs
40
48+20%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7870MIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7870M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 7870M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.

FeatureRadeon HD 7870MIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7870M draws 45W versus the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200's 15W — a 100% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7870M) vs 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureRadeon HD 7870MIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
TDP
45W
15W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Integrated
Perf/Watt
33.5
102.5+206%
💰

Value Analysis

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 7870MIntel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
MSRP
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$0
Codename
Heathrow
Broadwell GT3e
Release
April 24 2012
September 5 2014
Ranking
#765
#763