
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 270X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is positioned at rank #280 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 270X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire and Radeon R9 270X

Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 270X reaches 4,874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is built on GCN while the Radeon R9 270X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000+3% | 4,874 |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+100% | 1280 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 270X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 153.6 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270X) — a 16.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 270X. Bus width: 256-bit x2 vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s x2 | 179.2 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit x2 | 256-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 270X's 180W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon R9 270X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 180W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 109mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 C |
| Perf/Watt | 25.0 | 27.1+8% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 270X is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $40 |
| Codename | Wimbledon XT | Curacao |
| Release | May 1 2012 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #395 | #448 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















