
Arc A370M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A370M
2022Why buy it
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- β More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022β2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βFewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
2012Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.
Arc A370M
2022Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
2012Why buy it
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- β More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022β2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βFewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A370M better than Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A370M | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A370M | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A370M | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A370M | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A370M and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire

Arc A370M
Arc A370M
The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire uses GCN, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 2,560 (Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire).
| Feature | Arc A370M | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,115+2% | 5,000 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2560+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A370M | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A370M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire has 2 GB. The Arc A370M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A370M) vs 153.6 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire) β a 37.2% advantage for the Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | Arc A370M | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s x2+37% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit x2+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire's 200W β a 140.4% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Arc A370M | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-83% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 146.1+484% | 25.0 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













