
Radeon HD 8180 vs RADEON HD 6350

Radeon HD 8180
Popular choices:

RADEON HD 6350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8180 is positioned at rank 496 and the RADEON HD 6350 is on rank 240, so the RADEON HD 6350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8180
Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD 6350
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON HD 6350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8180.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8180 | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8180 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8180 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $30), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 474.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8180 | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+474.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8180 and RADEON HD 6350

Radeon HD 8180
The Radeon HD 8180 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points.

RADEON HD 6350
The RADEON HD 6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 141 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8180 scores 135 and the RADEON HD 6350 reaches 141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8180 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RADEON HD 6350 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 8180) vs 1,280 (RADEON HD 6350). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8180) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (RADEON HD 6350).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8180 | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 135 | 141+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1280+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.992 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+94% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 320 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8180 | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 8180) vs 512 KB (RADEON HD 6350) — the RADEON HD 6350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8180 | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8180 draws 50W versus the RADEON HD 6350's 186W — a 115.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8180 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8180) vs 350W (RADEON HD 6350). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8180 | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-73% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7+238% | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8180 launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the RADEON HD 6350 launched at $30 and now averages $30. The Radeon HD 8180 costs 83.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.0 (Radeon HD 8180) vs 4.7 (RADEON HD 6350) — the Radeon HD 8180 offers 474.5% better value. The Radeon HD 8180 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8180 | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30 | $30 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-83% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.0+474% | 4.7 |
| Codename | Venus | Cayman |
| Release | April 1 2013 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #745 | #598 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















