Radeon HD 8310E vs FirePro RG220
Radeon HD 8310E
Popular choices:
FirePro RG220
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 8310E is positioned at rank #181 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8310E
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8310E is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro RG220.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8310E | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro RG220 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro RG220 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 145.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8310E | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+145.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8310E and FirePro RG220
Radeon HD 8310E
The Radeon HD 8310E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.
FirePro RG220
The FirePro RG220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8310E scores 341 and the FirePro RG220 reaches 335 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8310E is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro RG220 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,120 (Radeon HD 8310E) vs 768 (FirePro RG220). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8310E) vs 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro RG220).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8310E | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 341+2% | 335 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1120+46% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.792 TFLOPS+41% | 1.267 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 56+17% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 192 KB+71% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8310E | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8310E | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8310E draws 175W versus the FirePro RG220's 150W — a 15.4% difference. The FirePro RG220 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8310E) vs 350W (FirePro RG220). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8310E | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 150W-14% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | Unknown |
| Perf/Watt | 1.9 | 2.2+16% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8310E launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the FirePro RG220 launched at $0 and now averages $20. The FirePro RG220 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (Radeon HD 8310E) vs 16.8 (FirePro RG220) — the FirePro RG220 offers 147.1% better value. The FirePro RG220 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8310E | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $20-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 16.8+147% |
| Codename | Cypress | Pitcairn |
| Release | February 25 2010 | February 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #724 | #619 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8310E and FirePro RG220
