Radeon HD 8310E vs Radeon R5 310

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 8310E vs Radeon R5 310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 8310E vs Radeon R5 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 8310E

2010

Why buy it

✅50.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌250% higher power demand at 175W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 310

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 175W, a 125W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8310E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8310E is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 50.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (341 vs 332), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 8310E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8310E makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 more expensive on MSRP at $50 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.7% (6.8 vs 6.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon HD 8310E vs Radeon R5 310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 8310E

The Radeon HD 8310E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.

Radeon R5 310

The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8310E scores 341 and the Radeon R5 310 reaches 332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8310E is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 310 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,120 (Radeon HD 8310E) vs 384 (Radeon R5 310). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8310E) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 310).

Feature	Radeon HD 8310E	Radeon R5 310
G3D Mark Score	341+3%	332
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 3.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1120+192%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.792 TFLOPS+128%	0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	56+133%	24
L1 Cache	112 KB+17%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 8310E	Radeon R5 310
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8310E and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 310. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 8310E) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 310) — the Radeon HD 8310E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 8310E	Radeon R5 310
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8310E draws 175W versus the Radeon R5 310's 50W — a 111.1% difference. The Radeon R5 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8310E) vs 350W (Radeon R5 310). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon HD 8310E	Radeon R5 310
TDP	175W	50W-71%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	1.9	6.6+247%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 8310E came in at $50, while the Radeon R5 310 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R5 310 was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.8 (Radeon HD 8310E) vs 6.8 (Radeon R5 310) — the Radeon R5 310 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 310 (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	Radeon HD 8310E	Radeon R5 310
MSRP	$50	$49-2%
Performance per Dollar	6.8	6.8
Codename	Cypress	Weston
Release	February 25 2010	April 18 2017
Ranking	#724	#873

Search Radeon HD 8310E on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.