Mobility Radeon HD 565v vs Radeon HD 8310E

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 565v

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8310E

2010Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 565v vs Radeon HD 8310E Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 565v vs Radeon HD 8310E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 565v

2010

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 175W, a 125W reduction.
  • More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 98% HIGHER MSRP
    $99 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 6.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8310E

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $49 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • Delivers 91.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.8 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 250% higher power demand at 175W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 565v is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (353 vs 341), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 565v is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8310E makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 91.3% (6.8 vs 3.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8310E is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Mobility Radeon HD 565v has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 565v vs Radeon HD 8310E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 565v

The Mobility Radeon HD 565v is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 353 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8310E

The Radeon HD 8310E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 565v scores 353 and the Radeon HD 8310E reaches 341 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 565v is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 8310E uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 8310E). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8310E).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 565vRadeon HD 8310E
G3D Mark Score
353+4%
341
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
800
1120+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
1.792 TFLOPS+60%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
56+40%
L1 Cache
80 KB
112 KB+40%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 565vRadeon HD 8310E
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 565v has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8310E carries 512 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 565v gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 565v and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8310E. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8310E) — the Radeon HD 8310E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 565vRadeon HD 8310E
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 565v draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 8310E's 175W — a 111.1% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 565v is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8310E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 565vRadeon HD 8310E
TDP
50W-71%
175W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
7.1+274%
1.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 565v came in at $99, while the Radeon HD 8310E launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8310E was 49.5% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs 6.8 (Radeon HD 8310E) — the Radeon HD 8310E offers 88.9% better value.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 565vRadeon HD 8310E
MSRP
$99
$50-49%
Performance per Dollar
3.6
6.8+89%
Codename
Broadway
Cypress
Release
January 7 2010
February 25 2010
Ranking
#846
#724

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.