Mobility Radeon HD 565v vs Mobility Radeon HD 3850

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 565v

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3850

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 565v vs Mobility Radeon HD 3850 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 565v vs Mobility Radeon HD 3850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 565v

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $51 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 46.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Mobility Radeon HD 3850

2010

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 51.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (366 vs 353), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 565v is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 565v makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 46.1% (3.6 vs 2.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Mobility Radeon HD 3850 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Mobility Radeon HD 565v vs Mobility Radeon HD 3850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 565v

The Mobility Radeon HD 565v is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 353 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3850

The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 366 points.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 565v scores 353 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 reaches 366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 565v is built on TeraScale 2 while the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3850). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3850).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 565vMobility Radeon HD 3850
G3D Mark Score
353
366+4%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
800
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
80 KB
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 565vMobility Radeon HD 3850
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 565v has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 carries 512 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 565v gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 565v and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3850.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 565vMobility Radeon HD 3850
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 565v draws 50W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3850's 50W — a 0% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3850). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 565vMobility Radeon HD 3850
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
7.1
7.3+3%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 565v came in at $99, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 launched at $150. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 565v was 34% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (Mobility Radeon HD 565v) vs 2.4 (Mobility Radeon HD 3850) — the Mobility Radeon HD 565v offers 50% better value.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 565vMobility Radeon HD 3850
MSRP
$99-34%
$150
Performance per Dollar
3.6+50%
2.4
Codename
Broadway
Broadway
Release
January 7 2010
January 7 2010
Ranking
#846
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.